General Health

General health issues, Medical conditions, Research and studies and more

Mental Health

Natural Medicine

Nutritional supplements, Herbs, Alternative medicine and more…

Wellness & Lifestyle

Nutrition, Diets, Healthy living, Detox, Exercise and Physical Fitness, Sports Fitness and more…

Women’s Health

Relationships, Pregnancy, Birth control, Menopause and more

Home » Information, News

Comparing Treatments for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer

Article / Review by on July 18, 2011 – 9:12 pmNo Comments

Comparing Treatments for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer

In a large clinical trial, short-term hormone therapy in combination with radiation therapy proved a more effective treatment than radiation therapy alone for men with intermediate-risk, early-stage prostate cancer.

Comparing Treatments for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer. In a large clinical trial, short-term hormone therapy in combination with radiation therapy proved a more effective treatment than radiation therapy alone for men with intermediate-risk, early-stage prostate cancer.Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has enabled earlier diagnosis of prostate cancer. But treatments for prostate cancer were mostly developed and tested against later stage, bulkier tumors. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, a clinical cooperative group funded by NIH’s National Cancer Institute (NCI), set out to test treatments for early-stage prostate cancer.

The researchers enrolled nearly 2,000 men with early-stage prostate cancer. All had localized prostate cancer and PSA levels of less than 20 nanograms per milliliter. Because prostate cancer rates are higher among African-American men, the study enrolled nearly 400 African-American patients.

Particpants were randomly assigned to treatment with radiation alone or radiation plus short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), in which drugs administered over 4 months block the natural production of testosterone. Past studies found that short-term ADT improves survival among patients with later stage tumors. The scientists looked at several outcomes, including lifespan, whether deaths occurred from prostate cancer or some other cause, and whether the cancer spread. The results appeared in the July 14, 2011, edition of New England Journal of Medicine.

The researchers found that short-term ADT and radiation improved overall survival at 10 years compared with radiation therapy alone (62% vs. 57%). Adding short-term ADT to radiation therapy also led to fewer prostate cancer-related deaths (4% vs. 8%). Similar benefits from short-term ADT were seen in white and African-American populations.

The researchers next asked whether treatment efficacy differed by disease risk. They grouped the patients into 3 risk categories—high, intermediate and low—based on several parameters, including Gleason score (in which a pathologist assigns the tumor a grade based on an analysis of tissue samples from a biopsy), PSA level and clinical stage of the disease.

The intermediate-risk subgroup benefitted the most from the addition of short-term ADT. Their 10-year overall survival rate increased from 54% with radiotherapy alone to 61% with short-term ADT and radiation. Prostate cancer-related deaths were reduced from 10% to 3%. The researchers note that a longer follow-up might also reveal some benefit from short-term ADT for men with low-risk disease. However, short-term ADT can cause hot flashes and higher rates of erectile dysfunction. At this point, the findings don’t support adding short-term ADT for low-risk prostate cancer.

“This study has important significance for clinical care,” says lead author Dr. Christopher U. Jones of Radiological Associates of Sacramento, California. “We now have strong scientific evidence about which patients with early-stage prostate cancer benefit from short-term ADT. This is important both for improved clinical care and the utilization of health care resources.”


*  The above story is reprinted from materials provided by National Institutes of Health (NIH)
** The National Institutes of Health (NIH) , a part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, is the nation’s medical research agency—making important discoveries that improve health and save lives. The National Institutes of Health is made up of 27 different components called Institutes and Centers. Each has its own specific research agenda. All but three of these components receive their funding directly from Congress, and administrate their own budgets.

More about National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Tags: , , , , , ,

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>